Here are the opening positions for this demonstration, adjusted for commissions:
Positions:
| Buy Date |
Symbol |
Price Paid |
Call sell date |
Month |
Strike |
Premium |
Notes |
| 10/16/2007 |
WFMI |
49.45 |
10/29/2007 |
Jan |
52.5 |
2.34 |
Div. expected in Jan. |
| 10/25/2007 |
NUAN |
21.65 |
10/25/2007 |
Apr |
25 |
1.99 |
|
| 10/26/2007 |
CYBS |
16.41 |
10/26/2007 |
Jan |
17.5 |
.89 |
|
| 10/29/2007 |
EGLE |
34.54 |
10/29/2007 |
Mar |
35 |
3.39 |
Div: .50 on 11/28/07 |
| 10/30/2007 |
NVDA |
34.09 |
10/30/2007 |
Nov |
35 |
1.59 |
|
| 10/30/2007 |
ACAS |
41.61 |
10/31/2007 |
Feb |
45 |
1.79 |
Div: 1.00 on 1/16/08 |
The stock purchases cost $ 19,775, and the sold calls brought in $ 1,119 in premiums, leaving a cash balance of $1,424 (vs $225 for the notional Buy Only investor).
Just a quick note about my stock selection here. As I noted earlier, these are actual trades that I am tracking as a separate part of my personal equities portfolio. I took the positions for this demonstration of the BHW vs BO strategies because they are companies that I have already been investing in and selling calls against for months or years. I’m a lazy investor who doesn’t spend all my waking hours researching new ideas, nor do I like to fuss with or fret over my core holdings too much — I often go weeks or months without logging into my brokerage account. Which goes to show that the average joe-investor could deploy the BHW strategy without too much extra effort than what they are already doing.
October 31, 2007 -
Posted by
spotztrend |
> ACAS, > CYBS, > EGLE, > NUAN, > NVDA, > WFMI, Investing & Investments, covered calls |
> ACAS, > CYBS, > EGLE, > NUAN, > NVDA, > WFMI, covered calls, investing strategies, model portfolio, options, stocks |
No Comments
No comments yet.